|
Post by Christine on Jul 29, 2014 21:37:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Jul 29, 2014 21:38:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Jul 29, 2014 21:40:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Jul 29, 2014 21:41:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maudes harold on Jul 30, 2014 2:01:55 GMT -5
Despite what the reports may say, I'm having a hard time believing that those are not slash marks or deeper rope burns on Sharon's face. The 2nd pic looks as if she has been washed already, so the blood would have been washed away and we're left with what looks like cuts or deeper burns.
If they are rope burns they look like they would have taken a relatively substantial amount of time and pressure to get them.
|
|
|
Post by Sib on Jul 30, 2014 8:56:55 GMT -5
I don't see them as rope burns....could it be rug burns or marks after she hit the floor?
|
|
|
Post by Sib on Jul 30, 2014 8:58:04 GMT -5
Have we had definitive proof that she was hung for any degree of time?
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Jul 30, 2014 16:10:14 GMT -5
There is no real good angle of her cheek. Will try and blow it up further.
|
|
|
Post by ayden2000 on Jul 30, 2014 19:08:35 GMT -5
If it was a frenzied attack, i wonder why they did not stab her stomach. I mean her son was not hurt, well apart from being starved of oxygen which is bad enough, but all the other victims were stabbed all over there body. It seems like they intentionally never stabbed her stomach area.
|
|
|
Post by mother62 on Jul 31, 2014 13:11:10 GMT -5
If it was a frenzied attackin i wonder why they did notpregnancy her stomach. I mean her son was not hurt, well apart from being starved of oxygen which is bad enough, but all the other victims were stabbed all over there body. It seems like they intentionally never stabbed her stomach area. In Tex Watsons book he swore he didnt notice that Sharon was pregnant. I find that somewhat hard to believe because she was in the last few weeks of her pregnancy and was wearing very little clothing. Can speed really work up such a frenzy thta the user woukd not notice her condition as Tex has claimed?
|
|
|
Post by Mrs_Toni on Jul 31, 2014 18:24:46 GMT -5
How could one not recognize an 8.5 month pregnant woman? Though it is odd that they didn't stab the stomach area.
|
|
|
Post by ayden2000 on Aug 1, 2014 3:57:08 GMT -5
If it was a frenzied attackin i wonder why they did notpregnancy her stomach. I mean her son was not hurt, well apart from being starved of oxygen which is bad enough, but all the other victims were stabbed all over there body. It seems like they intentionally never stabbed her stomach area. In Tex Watsons book he swore he didnt notice that Sharon was pregnant. I find that somewhat hard to believe because she was in the last few weeks of her pregnancy and was wearing very little clothing. Can speed really work up such a frenzy thta the user woukd not notice her condition as Tex has claimed? Well, i have never stabbed anyone before as i only took a small amount of speed per time, which is fine  lol. I think they knew she was pregnant, High or not. They were/are evil to the core. I don't understand if Tex says he never knew she was pregnant, why in such a frenzied attack her stomach never took one wound. What they did not want to harm her baby, were they that thick they thought he would survive in his dead mothers womb.
|
|
|
Post by Sib on Aug 1, 2014 7:25:00 GMT -5
If it was a frenzied attack, i wonder why they did not stab her stomach. I mean her son was not hurt, well apart from being starved of oxygen which is bad enough, but all the other victims were stabbed all over there body. It seems like they intentionally never stabbed her stomach area. I think she would been putting all her effort into protecting her stomach...either with her hands or by twisting and turning as they attacked.i think after she was stabbed in the chest her fight was just about over...there are scars on her arms that would be consistent with her having her arms across her belly..therefore really only exposing her chest...just a thought
|
|
|
Post by Sib on Aug 1, 2014 7:30:30 GMT -5
It is possible that it did not register with him...he had a lot on his plate when shit hit the fan,.,the girls were no the most reliable helpers..I can see his mind racing, maybe panicking and not taking in that detail...just saying...possible...sometimes we don't see things that right in front of us...who knows?
|
|
|
Post by maudes harold on Aug 1, 2014 10:34:40 GMT -5
I think it's quite possible that Tex did not notice she was pregnant at first. But, by the time he was plunging that knife in her, up close and personal, I think he knew, which is why he didn't or couldn't, stab her directly in the stomach. I think that was too much even for Sir Stabsalot! Ugh!!
|
|
|
Post by ayden2000 on Aug 1, 2014 17:32:33 GMT -5
It is possible that it did not register with him...he had a lot on his plate when shit hit the fan,.,the girls were no the most reliable helpers..I can see his mind racing, maybe panicking and not taking in that detail...just saying...possible...sometimes we don't see things that right in front of us...who knows? Never thought of it that way. So sad protecting her baby until the end. I am new to some of the crime scene pictures. I saw Gibbie's one at the morgue and could not get it out of my head.
|
|
|
Post by Sib on Aug 1, 2014 21:40:44 GMT -5
Yeah her on the lawn sticks with me..brutalized...but in some strange way - if you can get by the blood - peaceful...does that sound strange?
|
|
|
Post by maudes harold on Aug 1, 2014 21:47:49 GMT -5
It is possible that it did not register with him...he had a lot on his plate when shit hit the fan,.,the girls were no the most reliable helpers..I can see his mind racing, maybe panicking and not taking in that detail...just saying...possible...sometimes we don't see things that right in front of us...who knows? I think that is definitely possible as well. WHen you think of ALL the possible permutations of and in this case, it is mind-boggling!!! I know what you mean about the peaceful look sib. Sharon seems to have what my dad would refer to as the 'death rictus smile'.
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Aug 6, 2014 22:20:47 GMT -5
  Courtesy of Miss Toni
|
|
|
Post by Mrs_Toni on Aug 6, 2014 22:48:57 GMT -5
TFH territory here. Why are these autopsy photos so drastically different in quality? In the "Kitchen Sink" thread, Maude posted a very strange article stating the Cielo deaths were staged...not going into that here (need more than a tin foil hat for that very very interesting thread!) but are these of the same autopsy?
1. How could they be so drastically different in quality? Clear color vs grainy black and white. Other crime scene photos are the same in very different qualities. 2. And that article points out "Who is R. Wilson?" Nogucchi was the coroner. 3. Shouldn't it have stated Sharon Tate Polanski as the identifier on the ruler? 4. And why are the arm and chest injuries looking more like bullet holes than stab or slice wounds? 5. And is that an 8 1/2 month pregnant woman in the first photo?
Thanks, MH, you got me going with that article! Not that I think the deaths were staged, but some of this doesn't make sense. Is the first photo of the same autopsy? Why such variance in photo quality?
|
|